In 2024, Africa stood at what many analysts described as an electoral super cycle. Thirteen countries went to the polls, testing not only the durability of democratic institutions but also the patience of citizens who had grown weary of governance that often promised representation yet delivered disappointment.
On the surface, democracy seemed to endure. New governments emerged in Botswana, Liberia, Ghana, and Senegal, while South Africa entered unfamiliar but democratic terrain with a governing coalition. For a continent long portrayed as politically fragile, these outcomes offered a cautious sense of relief.
But democracy is not sustained by ballots alone. By the close of 2025, a deeper reckoning had set in. Afrobarometer surveys consistently showed that Africans still believe in democracy as the best form of governance, even as frustration with how it operates deepened. The contradiction became impossible to ignore: Africans had not rejected democracy; they were rejecting a version of it that felt increasingly hollow.
That tension, between democratic aspiration and democratic delivery, is the fault line upon which Africa’s political future now rests.
Elections, Trust, and the Quiet Crisis of Legitimacy
The elections of 2025 sharpened this dilemma. In Malawi, the process worked as democracy promises it should. The opposition won, the incumbent conceded, and power changed hands peacefully. It was not spectacular, but it was profound, proof that democratic consolidation on the continent remains possible.
Elsewhere, the picture was far darker. In Tanzania and Cameroon, elections became exercises in containment rather than competition. Opposition figures were sidelined, turnout dwindled, and post-election protests were met with force. What should have been moments of civic affirmation instead deepened public cynicism.
In Nigeria, the crisis was less explosive but no less serious. Elections continued to hold, yet faith in their credibility weakened. Boma Braide Esq., legal expert and founder of The Surge Youth Advocacy Group, captures this contradiction bluntly:
“Nigeria has made progress in holding regular elections, but the quality of these processes remains a concern. The electoral system is plagued by voter suppression, electoral violence, and lack of transparency.”
For many Nigerians, the problem is not democracy as an idea but democracy as an experience. Citizens queue to vote, only to watch outcomes distorted by manipulation and impunity. As Braide observes, “It appears that Nigeria is prioritizing the preservation of its democratic appearance over strengthening democracy in practice.”
This erosion of trust has consequences. When elections feel predetermined, participation declines. Democracy becomes procedural rather than participatory, a ritual observed, not a choice empowered.
Barracks, Borders, and the Burden of Regional Power
If elections exposed democracy’s fragility, coups laid bare its vulnerability. The military takeover in Madagascar and attempted coups in Nigeria and Benin reaffirmed a sobering truth: civilian rule across parts of Africa remains contingent, not guaranteed.
Yet December 7 marked a rupture in West Africa’s recent history. When a mutinous faction in Benin attempted to seize power, ECOWAS, led decisively by Nigeria, responded not with statements, but with force. Within hours, the coup collapsed. For the first time in years, the familiar script of military takeover followed by diplomatic outrage was torn up.
Oluwale Ojewale, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Security Studies, explains the significance without embellishment:
“The over-arching objective is to establish deterrence. ECOWAS has evolved. It is not just a dog that barks but can also bite.”
The intervention was about more than Benin. It was about stopping contagion. After Guinea-Bissau’s instability and entrenched juntas in the Sahel, another successful coup would have accelerated democratic collapse across the region. For Nigeria, the stakes were even higher.
“Nigeria cannot allow itself to be encircled by hostile governments,” Ojewale notes, pointing to the junta in Niger and the strategic threat a fallen Benin would have posed.
Nigeria’s jets and rapid mobilisation demonstrated regional strength, but they also exposed a paradox. Externally, Nigeria acted as democracy’s enforcer. Internally, it continues to struggle with insecurity, economic hardship, and shrinking civic space. Democracy can be defended with force across borders, but it must be sustained with legitimacy at home.
Youth, Civic Space, and Democracy’s Unfinished Work
Across Africa, young people have become democracy’s most restless conscience. From Kenya’s Gen Z protests to Madagascar’s mass mobilisations and Nigeria’s EndSARS movement, youth have refused silence in the face of exclusion. They organise online, mobilise fast, and speak with moral clarity, but often without institutional power.
Braide has seen this tension firsthand.
“Youth-led movements have been instrumental in bringing attention to critical issues, but they struggle to translate energy into sustained reform,” he explains, citing weak institutional access, co-optation, and deliberate suppression.
The problem is not apathy. It is obstruction. Young Africans face unemployment, inequality, and political systems dominated by aging elites who guard power jealously. When civic space shrinks, through laws like Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act, harassment of journalists, or violent crackdowns on protests, democracy loses its most vital engine.
Layered onto this is a newer threat: disinformation. AI-generated propaganda and coordinated foreign-backed narratives now distort political debate, glamorising military rule and discrediting democratic processes. When truth itself becomes contested, democracy’s foundation cracks.
Still, this is not a story of surrender. Civil society across Nigeria and the continent is adapting. Organisations like Surge Network are investing in voter education, grassroots mobilisation, and dialogue between citizens and institutions. Braide notes that over 15,000 youth leaders have already been empowered through such initiatives, quiet, patient work that rarely makes headlines but sustains democracy’s roots.
Africa’s democracy after 2025 is neither dead nor secure. It is contested, in polling units and protest grounds, in courtrooms and cyberspace, in regional summits and street corners. Citizens continue to demand democracy, not as a ceremony but as substance.
The question is no longer whether Africa wants democracy.
It is whether its leaders, civilian and military alike, are willing to deliver a version worthy of the faith its people continue to place in it.
Post a Comment